Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Par un écrivain mystérieux

Description

Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Civilian casualties from U.S. drone strikes - Wikipedia
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Ukraine asks US for new capabilities in fighting Iranian drones - ABC News
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Day of the Drone: We Need an International Convention on Drones - FPIF
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
The Pros & Cons of Drones in Counterterrorism
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Drone strikes a growing threat to African civilians - ISS Africa
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
World of Drones: Who Has What: Countries with Armed Drones
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Drone Strike!: UCAVs and Unmanned Aerial Warfare in the 21st Century: Yenne, Bill: 9781580072380: : Books
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
UAV Technology : Defence & Security : UK
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
The US Military Has Been Waiting for a Drone War Like One in Ukraine
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
US: Russian fighter jet knocks American drone out of sky over Black Sea
depuis par adulte (le prix varie selon la taille du groupe)